James Harden and Michael Jordan at the age of 35: A comparison that highlights the differences in their careers. Recently, I wrote about James Harden and Dwyane Wade, both at the age of 35, as they are top-tier shooting guards in the league. Now, let's talk about Harden and Jordan at 35. One is still writing his legend, while the other is a legend himself. At 35, Harden is in the twilight of his peak years, having played 15 seasons in the NBA since the 2009 season. He has amassed numerous accolades, including MVP, assists leader, sixth man of the year, and scoring champion. The only regret is the lack of a championship title, despite having two opportunities with the Rockets that fate did not favor him with. Throughout his career, Harden has been known for his high basketball IQ, ability to play within the rules, and comprehensive skill set, including step-back threes and various Euro-steps. His main weakness is underperforming in crucial moments, with solid regular-season leadership but faltering in the playoffs. This season, at 35, Harden averages 22.1 points, 6.5 rebounds, 8.3 assists, and 1.6 steals per game, with shooting percentages of 39.1%, 35.3%, and 88.9%. He has accumulated a total of 24,693 points in his NBA career so far. Jordan, on the other hand, started playing in the NBA in 1984, spending 13 seasons with the Bulls and 2 with the Wizards. In his 13 seasons with the Bulls, he won 10 scoring titles, an efficiency unmatched in NBA history. His skills were virtually flawless, described as…

Translation of the article content: Originally, I wasn't going to continue creating content today, but I just came across an article where Pippen has a significant opinion about Lillard being included in the Top 75, stating that Lillard doesn't have the qualifications to be among the Top 75 superstars, and that Howard, Gasol, Parker, McGrady, and others are more qualified than him. Regarding this article, I will continue to express my views. I believe that in the selection of superstars, players like Lillard, Anthony Davis, Westbrook should not be included at present, and even Harden is questionable! Many of the older players should not be included either! What does it mean to be a superstar? It should be top-notch in terms of personal ability, honors, and basketball influence! Or they should be outstanding representatives of a certain position, for example, Paul is the epitome of a pure point guard. Although he doesn't have an MVP or championship, he has maintained a high level for so many years. Who doesn't think of Paul when talking about point guards?! For instance, if Rodman can be selected, why can't Howard? They both won several rebounding titles and best defense awards; it's just that Rodman has one more championship than Howard! Lillard really doesn't qualify. Looking at his scoring, he doesn't have a scoring title; in terms of leadership, he doesn't have a championship, and he hasn't even made it to the finals. There are no minor honors for him at the guard position, and his personal honors of six All-Star selections and six…