Translation of the article content:
Originally, I wasn't going to continue creating content today, but I just came across an article where Pippen has a significant opinion about Lillard being included in the Top 75, stating that Lillard doesn't have the qualifications to be among the Top 75 superstars, and that Howard, Gasol, Parker, McGrady, and others are more qualified than him. Regarding this article, I will continue to express my views.
I believe that in the selection of superstars, players like Lillard, Anthony Davis, Westbrook should not be included at present, and even Harden is questionable! Many of the older players should not be included either! What does it mean to be a superstar? It should be top-notch in terms of personal ability, honors, and basketball influence! Or they should be outstanding representatives of a certain position, for example, Paul is the epitome of a pure point guard. Although he doesn't have an MVP or championship, he has maintained a high level for so many years. Who doesn't think of Paul when talking about point guards?! For instance, if Rodman can be selected, why can't Howard? They both won several rebounding titles and best defense awards; it's just that Rodman has one more championship than Howard!
Lillard really doesn't qualify. Looking at his scoring, he doesn't have a scoring title; in terms of leadership, he doesn't have a championship, and he hasn't even made it to the finals. There are no minor honors for him at the guard position, and his personal honors of six All-Star selections and six Best Lineups are also quite dull. On the other hand, Howard, who was not selected, can be said to have everything. As a center, except for not having a scoring title, there's nothing he doesn't have, and he even has a championship ring. It's really hard to understand.
Klay Thompson, Howard, Stoudemire, Deron Williams, Malone, Stockton. Iverson, Carter, Parker, Ginobili, Billups, Pau Gasol. Butler. These are all stronger than Paul and Lillard. Howard deserves to be in the Top 75. McGrady, in terms of scoring ability, is indeed historically ranked. The main reason for his possible omission might be too many injuries and a short career. Although his scoring ability is strong, he lacks historical achievements. Look at Melo, although he doesn't have a championship ring either, his scoring ability and total points are enough to rank him in the top eleven. I think Parker mainly relies on the system and team play with Duncan covering him and leading the team to achieve success. He hasn't proven his ability to lead a team, and his personal performance isn't tough enough; he still relies on the team system to play, so the possibility of being omitted is high. Howard is truly a pity; he really deserves it more than Anthony Davis.
This article is original to the author, and any plagiarism will be pursued!