The title of the article translated into English is: "Each side has its own story, Southern media: Liu Guoliang kindly helps Fan Zhendong, famous journalist refutes, public opinion leans one-sidedly

19/01/2025 45hotness 0likes

This matter, it's really a wave that hasn't calmed down before another rises. Fan Zhendong's withdrawal from the world rankings is like throwing a big stone into a calm lake, stirring up waves. The southern media claims that Liu Guoliang was well-intentioned in helping out, but He Xiaolong isn't buying it, and netizens' comments are exploding, overwhelmingly siding with He Xiaolong. Now, everyone wants to know, what's really going on behind this?

"Weekend Weekend" published an article trying to clear Liu Guoliang's name, saying that Liu Guoliang was using Fan Zhendong's withdrawal to put pressure on WTT, as if all this was for the good of the athletes. But He Xiaolong wasn't having it, directly countering that such a claim is utter nonsense. He believes that Liu Guoliang doesn't have the final say in WTT, so how could he solve problems through such means? Not to mention, if this were true, why agree to withdraw from the rankings first, and why not allow participation in the Asian Cup?

Speaking of this, do you feel a bit confused? These details are indeed perplexing. Some netizens recall the scene from the Li Ning sponsor meeting before the Paris Olympics, where Ma Long stood in the most prominent position and Liu Guoliang sat beside him, as if silently revealing some information. This matter becomes more intriguing the more you think about it.

The issue of athletes' own rights has also come to light. Top players have faced fan circle troubles over the years without receiving enough support, which is no small matter. Why choose veterans instead of young newcomers? Is there another reason behind such decisions? Liu Guoliang once said, "Champions are made by fighting, not by giving way," which inspired the hearts of many young people. But now, these words sound so ironic.

He Xiaolong's views have won the applause of most people. He emphasizes protecting athletes' professional development and personal interests, hitting the nail on the head. No one wants to see athletes' efforts overlooked or sacrificed. This incident has made people realize that while pursuing victory, attention should also be paid to the growth and development of each athlete. After all, they are the soul of this sport.

At this point, it's worth asking yourself: If you were Liu Guoliang, how would you handle this situation? Or which side would you stand on? Regardless, this controversy reminds us how important a healthy and harmonious sports environment is. It's not just about the results of competitions, but also about the dignity and rights of every participant.

Although this incident seems simple at first glance, it actually reflects different views within and outside the sports world regarding athlete management and competition arrangements. The public is seeking answers in this discussion, trying to find a path that respects tradition while adapting to the needs of the new era. In the end, although the article from "Weekend Weekend" has disappeared, the space for thought it left still exists, continuing to influence people's understanding of the sports field.

You see, this matter has escalated to the point where no one has been completely convinced. But one thing is certain: fairness, transparency in competitive environments, and respect for athletes are always the most important, regardless of the field. Ordinary folks watching the excitement also hope to see more positive changes. After all, isn't the core of sportsmanship about benefiting more people?