Zhao Rui has been suspended for five games and fined 100,000 yuan, a decision that has left everyone stunned. Honestly, this punishment seems somewhat confusing. The incident began when Zhao Rui collided with the referee, and his impulsive behavior was influenced by external factors. To put it bluntly, the referee's unfair rulings, coupled with the controversial nature of the game itself, led to this conflict. However, the final outcome makes people feel as if the wrong person was punished. Some netizens say: This matter is clearly the referee's problem; Zhao Rui had reasons to lose control of his emotions, yet he ended up being penalized with a five-game suspension. Isn't that too unfair? Honestly, what Zhao Rui did was indeed incorrect, but is this punishment too lenient? Colliding with a referee is a significant issue; logically, a heavier sentence should have been imposed to match the severity of the situation. Let's look at the events leading up to this. After the match against Shandong, Zhao Rui was suspended for five games and fined ten thousand due to his collision with the referee. This incident caused an uproar throughout the CBA circle. Although this punishment appears severe, in reality, most fans believe that Zhao Rui received a light sentence. Why do they say this? Because everyone believes that his action of colliding with the referee was severe and should have received a harsher punishment. When compared to Du Runwang's physical altercation with an opponent, Zhao Rui's behavior is seen as significantly more serious. Du Runwang did have a conflict, but at…