"Without our strategic planning, there would be no Warriors dynasty today." When Warriors owner Joe Lacob made this statement in an interview, many felt he was boasting about the management's decision-making capabilities. However, core player Stephen Curry did not buy into it. As a superstar who gives his all on the court, his efforts were clearly underestimated. This remark not only hurt Curry but also caused many fans to speak up for him: It was he who led the team to victory, so why was the credit casually attributed to the management? Lacob's inappropriate comment not only sparked controversy outside but also brought internal issues of the Warriors to light. Curry's dissatisfaction with the management was not a sudden occurrence but had been brewing for a long time. From Kevin Durant's joining in 2017 to the "failure" of the second overall pick in 2020, and now facing the dual pressure of nurturing young players while maintaining performance, Curry has repeatedly compromised yet also repeatedly taken the blame. The question is, how long can this four-time champion "dynasty team" last? Lacob's high-profile remarks are just the tip of the iceberg. The rift between the Warriors' management and Curry dates back to when Durant joined in 2017. At that time, the Warriors had already won the championship in 2015, and although they suffered a regrettable loss in 2016, their 73-win regular season record had proven the strength of their system. Curry even won the first-ever unanimous MVP that year, making the Warriors the brightest core in the league. However, Lacob insisted on…