On January 17th, Beijing time, the selection of CBA All-Star starters has sparked significant controversy and farce. Is it true that the selection process disregards a player's actual abilities? Three teams have been severely impacted. Choosing All-Star players should not only consider whether fans support you or your popularity but also take into account a player's abilities, their contributions to the team, and the team's overall performance. However, this year's All-Star starting lineup has indeed caused considerable controversy, with several teams feeling aggrieved because, despite their excellent records, their core players are unable to secure a spot in the starting lineup. Following the announcement of the starting lineup, the two teams most affected are undoubtedly Shanxi and Shandong, currently ranked second and third in the Northern Division. Despite their high rankings, neither team managed to secure a single player in the All-Star starting lineup, making it even more challenging for them to make the All-Star team at all. Isn't this situation problematic? For instance, the starting lineup includes four guards: Zhao Jiwei, Guo Ailun, Zhao Rui, and Xu Jie. The frontcourt for the North is Zeng Fanbo, Zhou Qi, and Yang Hanshen, while the South features Hu Jinqiu, Zhou Peng, and Lofton. Upon the release of this list, Shanxi and Shandong were left speechless. As two powerhouse teams ranked second and third, they couldn't get a single player into the lineup. Is this appropriate? Doesn't Shanxi have anyone deserving of an All-Star starting spot? Take Zhang Ning as an example; he plays with great intensity, has impressive statistics, and ranks…