In the second round of the Australian Open, Zheng Qinwen faced off against German veteran Siegemund and ultimately lost with a score of 0:2. After the match, the two penalties given by the umpire are likely to become a hot topic among fans. Both penalties were issued due to Zheng Qinwen's excessive time spent preparing to serve, especially after the second warning in the second set, which caused her to lose control of her emotions and miss a first serve opportunity. It is evident that these two penalties were quite crucial. Of course, there is no "if" in my tennis matches. These two penalties were seen as extremely unfair by many Chinese fans, and even the umpire was criticized by them. But was there really a problem with these penalties? It can be said that they do seem harsh, but their fairness is beyond doubt. After all, following the two warnings from the umpire, the broadcast camera immediately focused on the timer next to the umpire, which is used to calculate the player's serving preparation time. It is clear that the umpire made the decision based entirely on the timer and not on a subjective judgment that Zheng Qinwen's serving time was too long. Zheng Qinwen was indeed 100% over the limit, and according to the rules, she was not wronged at all by the penalty. In fact, the situation where Zheng Qinwen took too long to serve is not the first time it has appeared. During last year's Paris Olympics, in the quarter-finals, Zheng Qinwen eliminated American player Navarro,…