Gilbert Arenas recently discussed the double standard in the NBA community towards 40-year-old LeBron James and 40-year-old Michael Jordan, sparking a heated debate. In his podcast, Arenas defended James, stating that he is still performing at an elite level in his 22nd season in the NBA, and that the expectations placed on this Los Angeles Lakers star are unrealistic. "Jordan was averaging over 20 points when he was with the Wizards. That's impressive. But the best player at 40 is LeBron, second best is Michael Jordan. Yet, they had no expectations for Jordan; they were happy to see a 40-year-old player on the court, averaging 20 points. So why, when LeBron is on the court at 40, do they act like he's only 20?" Arenas emphasized the respect given to Jordan's performance with the Washington Wizards at age 40. At that time, Jordan averaged 20.0 points, 6.1 rebounds, and 3.8 assists, with a shooting percentage of 44.5% and a three-point percentage of just 29.1%. These statistics were celebrated as proof of his long career and status. However, LeBron James' statistics at the same age are significantly better. James averages 23.8 points, 7.7 rebounds, and 8.8 assists, with a shooting percentage of 50.7% and a three-point percentage of 38.6%. Despite these incredible performances, he still faces constant criticism rather than appreciation for his individual talent. LeBron James' dominance at 40 is unparalleled in NBA history. On his better days, James easily ranks among the top ten players in the league, and when he's at his peak, he can be considered one…