This season, when James and Anthony Davis are on the court together, their net efficiency is 3.3. In comparison, Tatum and Jaylen Brown have a net efficiency of 9.7, Mitchell and Garland have 8.9, and Doncic and Irving have 9.7. Judging from the data, James and Davis are still one of the most dominant duos in the NBA today. This leads to a frequently discussed topic: Does the Lakers really need a third star player? Speaking of this, we must mention Reeves. Point One: Data. Since Russell was traded to the Nets, specifically in the last five games against the Kings, Cavaliers, Trail Blazers, Hawks, and Rockets, Reeves has averaged 23 points, 6 rebounds, and 11 assists. Judging solely by the numbers, Reeves has reached the level of a star player. Point Two: Clutch Moments. During the same period, Reeves' shooting percentage in clutch moments is zero. In other words, when he becomes the focal point of the team's offense and receives special attention from opponents, Reeves' ability to make tough shots is still lacking. Based on these two points, Reeves has the potential to become a star, but he still needs time to hone his skills. As for the other Lakers players, such as Christie and Knickert, they are more functional types. In other words, even when they mature, they can only be immediate combatants and are not on par with stars. Considering these two points, at present, if the Lakers want to achieve something, they still need a third star player. More accurately, someone to help alleviate the…