In a recent match of the Table Tennis Super League, a controversial edge ball became the focus of attention and sparked a storm of public opinion both on and off the court. Sun Yingsha believed the ball had touched the edge and insisted on appealing, while Qian Tianyi firmly stated that the ball did not touch the edge. The referee ultimately refused to review the play. This incident ignited the emotions of the fans, and Qian Tianyi's post-match comments further fueled the controversy. Let's go back to the match scene. Sun Yingsha and Qian Tianyi were facing each other in a tense match when a ball that appeared to have touched the edge passed over the table from under Qian Tianyi's racket. Sun Yingsha raised her hand to signal the edge to the referee, but the referee did not accept it and even refused to use replay technology to confirm. Qian Tianyi was adamant that the ball did not touch the edge, and the standoff quickly spread from the court to the stands and even to the countless viewers watching the live broadcast. Does this scene seem familiar to you? Ping-pong fans around the world may have similar experiences - edge balls are one of the most common controversies in table tennis matches. Such judgments heavily rely on the referee's visual observation, but after all, humans are not infallible, and missing or misjudging is normal. Sun Yingsha is no stranger to such focal points in her career. For example, in a certain open tournament in 2022, she also became the…

Sasha, representing Shenzhen University and Shandong Luneng, faced Qian Tianyi in a match where the score was tied at 1-1. In the third set, with Sasha leading 8-7, a controversial moment occurred during their rally. Sasha, being very perceptive, heard the sound of the ball hitting the table and believed it was a net touch rather than out of bounds. However, Qian Tianyi, possibly not paying attention due to the intense competition, indicated that there was no net touch. Sasha insisted on her position, having played for over a decade and being able to hear such subtle sounds, knowing it was the sound of a net touch. She sought assistance from the referee, requesting to review the Hawk-Eye replay. Initially, the referee seemed indifferent, but Sasha explained that if the ball goes directly off the table, there would be no sound, but a net touch would be audible, and she had indeed heard it. The referee appeared somewhat unhappy and responded that there was no sound, but Sasha continued to request the Hawk-Eye review. It's unclear whether the review took place, but the point was ultimately awarded to Qian Tianyi. In this match between Sasha and Qian Tianyi, netizens felt indifferent about which player received the point, and there should be no blame placed on Qian Tianyi, as she has the right to advocate for herself if she genuinely did not see or hear the net touch. We, as fans of Sasha, must approach this issue fairly and justly, avoiding accusations without substantial evidence that the opponent knowingly lied about…