Translation of the article content:
The reason behind Liaoning Men's Basketball victory over Shanghai has surfaced, and it's neither the coach nor the tactics. Netizens have pointed out incisively that in this game, the referee's decision-making was blatantly lawless, completely ruining a good match. Liaoning team has always relied on defense to win games, but now their defense is far worse than before; the players are really getting old, moving slowly, and reacting slowly. This time, Shanghai let go of their strongest foreign aid, which allowed them to test the opponent's strength in advance. They can just come back strong at home.
Liaoning's two foreign aids later had poor shooting and were even afraid to shoot. They should find replacements quickly; they are too weak, and the last one who came was even worse, despite being hyped up previously.
Liaoning making it to the top four this year can be considered a success. In almost every game, it's basically Dahan setting up screens, with the two foreign aids taking mid-range and long-range shots. Can this one trick really conquer all opponents? So, this is how it is this year. Next year, they should focus more on training young players, as the older players are genuinely struggling to keep up. Through this game, I have a clear understanding that Shanghai team is currently among the top four in CBA, provided that their main players don't get injured. Even without Lofton today, they played so fiercely that anyone could see who's stronger.
Good defense is crucial; preventing the opponent from scoring is the priority, followed by effective offensive scoring. Therefore, Huzi's defense is considered average; he's the type who tries hard, but his defense lacks height and technique. It's suggested to use him less; everyone should observe carefully.
Also, Liaoning only narrowly won because Shanghai was missing a key player tonight. Yang Ming is stubborn and unchangeable; he should reflect on himself! Actually, even without Lofton, Shanghai would have won; Liaoning is currently too weak, and if it weren't for the referees, they wouldn't have won! It's easy to imagine that in the playoffs, with Lofton, they might crush Liaoning in three quarters! I just want to ask, does Chinese basketball have a management mechanism for referees? Is there a penalty system for referees? With this level of refereeing, it will be very difficult for Chinese basketball to improve. If Bradley hadn't been sent off, Shanghai would have had a greater chance of winning this game.
Now, Liaoning's guards all start with their hands first in defense; you can take a closer look. Whenever the referees blow the whistle against Liaoning, they are bound to lose. If the referees don't blow the whistle, the opposing foreign aids struggle with ball control and organization. On the other hand, Guangdong men's basketball team doesn't work like that; whenever they make a move, it's a foul, with Xu Jie and Huang Rongqi almost getting five fouls per game. In this game, Shanghai men's basketball team played quite well; it's mainly that the domestic guards were not performing well, and the foreign aids were also not delivering in the final minutes.
In the game between Liaoning and Shanghai, Yang Ming boldly used young players, which is a step forward. However, young players cannot only focus on defense and not offense; they should not leave all the attacking to the older players. Li Huyi, Yu Zechen, and Wang Lanqing all have attacking capabilities and should not be mere spectators; otherwise, there will be a lack of attacking points on the offensive end.
Thank you all for your continued attention to me. On the journey of creation, I am grateful for your company, and I will continue to work hard!