On January 13th, Beijing time, CBA referees held a meeting for nothing, directly calling technical fouls when they shouldn't, and it's very amateurish to have three technical fouls in a game.
The CBA referees recently just held a meeting, and the league officials also specially gave some norms to the referees, asking them to unify the refereeing standards because the referees have been criticized more and more recently. However, it seems that this meeting was really held for nothing. Why do I say that? Because in the game between Beijing and Fujian, the referees suddenly inexplicably blew three technical fouls, blowing three T's in just the first half.
What's even funnier is that the refereeing standards are also a bit confusing. We don't know what the normal refereeing standards are for this league now? Technical fouls are actually very rare in a game, and blowing three fouls can only happen if there is a large-scale conflict. However, the two sides didn't have any conflicts or fights, and there were no shoving actions, but they were blown three technical fouls, and the reasons for the fouls were very funny.
How did the first technical foul happen? At that time, in the first quarter, Joseph Young singled out Beijing and completed a layup. After the ball went in, he made a too small gesture, which is very common in the NBA. It's pressing down with the right hand, indicating that the defender is too small. He faced Beijing's foreign aid, Jerman, who is taller and stronger than him, and scored the goal, so he wanted to celebrate. Using this action may not be a problem, and there is no provocative meaning.
But as Joseph Young raised his hand and ran back, the referee immediately called a technical foul. The ones that should blow don't blow, and the ones that shouldn't blow blow blindly. Isn't this a waste of time? Fujian is really wronged. What's the problem with this foreign aid playing against Beijing? How could it be blown? This action has been done by several people recently. Why can't it be done when the opponent is Beijing? Sometimes it blows and sometimes it doesn't. This refereeing is really confusing.
If the CBA really decides that all these so-called provocative actions are not allowed, shouldn't you tell the 20 teams first? After the referee's meeting, you said which actions are not allowed. The teams have no idea at all. They get a T for no reason. What's going on? Joseph Young didn't provoke the other side. Why can't he do this too small when playing against Beijing? Basketball must have passion. Now, even this kind of action is not allowed. Only robot basketball is allowed?
What's funny is that the referee then made another controversial call. In the second quarter, Fan Ziming of Beijing and Sun Yansong of Fujian started to argue near the baseline. Mainly when grabbing rebounds, they had a mutual action when positioning, and both felt that each other's actions were a bit big.
Sun Yansong first spewed a few trash talks, and Fan Ziming immediately responded to him, but the two of them just argued without any actions, and the referee separated them in the middle, and their teammates pulled them apart. To be honest, where is this kind of trash talk not common? But the CBA doesn't allow trash talking, and the referee gives a technical foul to each side.
Fan Ziming also went to complain to the referee, saying, "He insulted me." Spraying trash talk on the court, to be honest, is really not a problem, right? The two of them had no fighting actions at that time, just normal positioning and arguing, but this is not allowed either, and trash talking is not allowed. Celebrating after scoring is not allowed, and spraying trash talk on the court is not allowed either. We can only say that the CBA absolutely does not allow playing passionate basketball now, and must play robot basketball. Is this strange? Do we have to make the league become a dead water that is well-regulated?