Everyone knows that I like to browse through articles and select some viewpoints to describe my own different opinions. I came across an article where Allen Iverson believes that from 2000 to the present, the player he fears most in a one-on-one matchup is Tracy McGrady. It seems that both of them are heroes who respect each other. So, who has the greater chance of winning in a one-on-one between the two? Let's continue to discuss this.
First, let's praise both of them. In their prime, they were both unstoppable on offense, one as a shooting guard and the other as a small forward. Although they have faced each other before, it's difficult to determine who is stronger. We can only analyze and judge based on their skills and physical talents.
In a one-on-one situation, there's no help defense or anything like that. McGrady's advantage is definitely his height, and his individual scoring ability is top-notch. During his peak, his individual scoring ability could be said to be on par with Jordan and Kobe. They should be considered in the same category. Therefore, McGrady can use his physical advantage to score against Iverson, and his shooting accuracy is not low either, so McGrady definitely has the upper hand in this aspect. On the other hand, Iverson's advantage is definitely his speed, with strong mobility. Facing Iverson's speed and mobility, McGrady would also suffer, because players over 2 meters tall generally have slower speed and mobility, which I believe everyone will agree with.
Old fans who have watched Kobe and Iverson play against each other know that Iverson often uses fancy dribbling to break through opponents, combined with his speed and sudden changes of direction. If you don't keep up with him at the first step, you basically have no chance. Iverson once used his exquisite dribbling skills and quick speed to make Jordan fall. Of course, McGrady also has his advantages, with his physical talent and large defensive area, as well as his fadeaway jump shot, which Iverson couldn't do much about. If there's a time limit for the one-on-one, I believe it would be a 50-50 chance for both of them.
If there's no time limit, I think Iverson would have a greater chance of winning. After all, looking at the construction of physical fitness, people with suitable body shapes carry less weight, have stable steps, and strong stamina, while those who can reach over 2 meters in height usually don't have these advantages. Without a time limit, it would definitely be a bigger win for Iverson.
This article is original to the author, and any plagiarism will be investigated!