Sun Yingsha and Wang Chuqin, the "traffic kings" of the Chinese table tennis team, once again stand at the forefront of public opinion. This time, the controversy was sparked by the sharp remarks of a veteran sports journalist, He Xiaolong. He criticized Wang Chuqin for "having nothing," said Sun Yingsha was "overhyped," and even thought that this was unfair to the resource allocation of the national table tennis team, and even bluntly stated that this approach was disrespectful to legendary players like Deng Yaping and Zhang Yining. Such bold views quickly ignited the discussion among fans. So, do these statements make sense? Let's analyze it calmly. 1. Does Wang Chuqin really have "nothing"? First, let's talk about Wang Chuqin. This rising leader who has been highly anticipated by the outside world has indeed received great attention and resource tilt during the Paris Olympic cycle. From the Asian Games to the World Table Tennis Championships, Wang Chuqin participated in multiple events, striving to make a comprehensive breakthrough in singles, doubles, mixed doubles and other events. He Xiaolong criticized him for "having nothing," mainly because of his failure in the Paris Olympics - he stopped in the top 32 of the men's singles competition and failed to carry the banner of China's men's table tennis as expected. But can "having nothing" really summarize Wang Chuqin's strength? Obviously not objective enough. Wang Chuqin's growth in the past few years is obvious to all. His style of play is fierce and his skills are comprehensive. Especially his ability to withstand pressure in adverse situations…